ormer health secretary Sajid Javid has called for a royal commission into the NHS, describing the service as “frozen in time”.
Ahead of the 75th anniversary of the health service on Wednesday, Mr Javid said both major political parties privately believe the NHS is “unsustainable” in its current form and will increasingly be unable to cope with surging levels of demand, despite record levels of funding.
Writing in The Times, Mr Javid said a “dispassionate and honest assessment” of the NHS is required to “make sure the NHS is here in another 75 years”.
He said: “No universal healthcare system is perfect, but when you compare health outcomes in the UK with similar countries, it is clear that for decades we have fallen short across successive governments.
To make sure the NHS is here in another 75 years, we need a royal commission
“It’s a direct consequence of how the NHS is still structured. Since it was established in 1948, the world has significantly changed — yet much of the institution remains frozen in time.”
Highlighting Britain’s ageing population and the lingering impact of the pandemic, Mr Javid said the supply of healthcare will continue to be outstripped by soaring demand.
“All of this is at a time of record funding for the NHS,” he wrote.
“In 2000, the health budget accounted for 27 per cent of day-to-day UK public spending; next year it will hit 44 per cent, larger than the GDP of Greece.
“The entire British state is on the verge of becoming a subsidiary of the NHS.”
Mr Javid also pointed to the “politicisation” of the NHS and its future as a key factor in the health service’s present struggles.
“Set up correctly, a royal commission can be the force to help break the current deadlock,” he said, stressing it should be used to “assess what structural reforms are required and how we should be learning from other countries”.
Mr Javid added: “Now is the time for the national interest to come to the fore with a collective mandate for reform.
“To make sure the NHS is here in another 75 years, we need a royal commission.”
