LONDON WALLET
  • Home
  • Investing
  • Business Finance
  • Markets
  • Industries
  • Opinion
  • UK
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
No Result
View All Result
LONDON WALLET
  • Home
  • Investing
  • Business Finance
  • Markets
  • Industries
  • Opinion
  • UK
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
No Result
View All Result
LondonWallet
No Result
View All Result

ZachXBT Exposes $2-Million Coinbase Impersonation Scam Onchain Clues

Carl Sandburg by Carl Sandburg
January 5, 2026
in Crypto
ZachXBT Exposes -Million Coinbase Impersonation Scam Onchain Clues
74
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


You might also like

Saylor Signals Week 12 of Consecutive Bitcoin Buys From Strategy

WLFI May Have Signaled Crypto Crash Hours Before Bitcoin: Study

Mirae Asset to Buy Controlling Stake at Korea’s Korbit Exchange for $93M

Key takeaways:

  • A convincing “Coinbase support” impersonation campaign was linked by onchain investigator ZachXBT to roughly $2 million in stolen crypto.

  • The attribution relied on corroboration across multiple signals, including onchain activity and Telegram or social media footprints rather than a single “magic” transaction.

  • Coinbase says its real support team will never ask for your password or 2FA codes or request that you move funds to a so-called “safe” address.

  • These schemes are part of a broader fraud wave. The FBI reported more than $16 billion in internet crime losses in 2024 based on 859,532 complaints.

A caller claiming to be “Coinbase support” can sound polished, patient and strangely urgent, which is exactly the mix that makes smart people move too fast. In a recent case, onchain investigator ZachXBT said this kind of impersonation campaign netted an alleged scammer roughly $2 million in crypto from Coinbase users and that the suspect’s own online footprint helped connect the dots.

Indeed, some of the biggest threats in crypto are not smart contracts or zero-day exploits, but routine social engineering. These are the same low-tech pressure tactics appearing across the internet at scale. The US Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) says reported cybercrime losses in 2024 exceeded $16 billion, and many schemes begin with nothing more than a convincing message or a spoofed call.

Did you know? In 2024, the FBI said people aged 60 and older were hit hardest overall, reporting nearly $5 billion in losses.

What happened?

The case ZachXBT flagged was an old-school confidence trick dressed up as “customer support.”

According to ZachXBT, an alleged scammer posed as a Coinbase help desk worker and used social engineering tactics to convince victims he worked for the exchange, with losses totaling roughly $2 million over the past year.

ZachXBT said he was able to narrow in on the suspect by cross-referencing Telegram group chat screenshots, social media posts and onchain activity, and by sharing a leaked video that appeared to show the alleged scammer speaking with a victim while offering fake support.

The scam leaned on urgency and authority, including warnings about suspicious access, a so-called “security procedure” and pressure to act immediately.

Coinbase has repeatedly warned that scammers may spoof phone numbers and pose as employees, attempting to push users into “protecting” their funds by moving them. The company says legitimate support will never ask for passwords, two-factor authentication (2FA) codes, seed phrases or transfers to a “safe” address or new wallet.

Did you know? ZachXBT also claimed the operator tried to muddy the trail by buying “expensive Telegram usernames” and repeatedly deleting old accounts; however, it was still “easy” to hone in on the individual due to their frequent online gloating and lifestyle posts that ignored basic operational security.

Who is ZachXBT?

ZachXBT is a pseudonymous onchain investigator who has built a reputation by publishing detailed public threads about hacks, scams and suspicious fund movements, often before exchanges or authorities comment.

Major outlets have profiled him as an independent “crypto detective,” and his work has been cited in real-world cases where investigators later moved in on suspects.

This is why a ZachXBT post can race through the industry in hours. When he publishes an attribution claim, it can trigger new victim reports, push platforms to review accounts linked to the activity and shape how the wider market talks about an incident.

Coinbase’s own warnings and the hard truth about “support”

Coinbase’s security guidance on impersonation scams is unusually blunt. If someone contacts you claiming to be from Coinbase and pushes you to act fast, assume it is malicious until proven otherwise.

Coinbase warns that scammers regularly pose as employees and attempt to pressure users into moving funds. The company says no one will ever ask for your password or 2FA codes or request that you transfer assets to a specific or “new” address, account, vault or wallet.

In a dedicated blog post about customer support scams, Coinbase emphasizes the same pattern: Do not share login details or verification codes, do not click third-party links or install software at a caller’s request, and only reach support through official channels, not numbers or links provided to you out of the blue.

Adopt a default reflex to slow down, end the conversation and verify independently. Social engineering works when the attacker controls the tempo. Coinbase’s guidance is designed to break that tempo before money moves.

When data access feeds social engineering

One reason “support” scams can feel so convincing is that criminals sometimes show up with real context, such as a name, phone number, partial identifiers or account hints that make the call feel legitimate.

In May 2025, Coinbase disclosed an extortion attempt tied to rogue overseas support agents who were allegedly bribed or recruited to pull customer data from internal support systems, specifically to enable social engineering attacks. Coinbase said passwords, private keys and wallet access were not compromised but added that it would reimburse customers who were tricked into sending funds to attackers.

For impersonation crews, personal data is force-multiplying fuel. It makes the lie easier to sell and hesitation harder to sustain.

“Support” is the attack surface, and stolen context worsens it

When someone reaches out claiming to be “Coinbase support” and tries to rush you into a decision, the safest general assumption is that you are dealing with an impostor.

Coinbase says it will never ask you to move or “secure” funds, request a seed phrase, ask for your password or two-step verification codes, or push you to install software on your device. The company also warns that scammers can spoof legitimate phone numbers, making caller ID a weak signal.

That is why Coinbase’s own consumer protection posts keep returning to the same principle: Break the attacker’s tempo. End the call or chat, then verify independently through official channels rather than using any number, link or “case ID” given to you in the moment.

The uncomfortable reality is that these scams can become far more persuasive when criminals have real personal details to weave into the pitch.

You do not need to be outsmarted onchain to lose money in crypto. In many cases, you only need to be rushed at the wrong moment by someone who sounds credible, and sometimes, that credibility is built on stolen context.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.



Source link

Share30Tweet19
Previous Post

2026 tax brackets could mean a slightly bigger paycheck — what to expect

Next Post

Ledger Confirms Global-e Breach Did Not Affect Wallets

Carl Sandburg

Carl Sandburg

Recommended For You

Saylor Signals Week 12 of Consecutive Bitcoin Buys From Strategy
Crypto

Saylor Signals Week 12 of Consecutive Bitcoin Buys From Strategy

February 15, 2026
WLFI May Have Signaled Crypto Crash Hours Before Bitcoin: Study
Crypto

WLFI May Have Signaled Crypto Crash Hours Before Bitcoin: Study

February 15, 2026
Mirae Asset to Buy Controlling Stake at Korea’s Korbit Exchange for M
Crypto

Mirae Asset to Buy Controlling Stake at Korea’s Korbit Exchange for $93M

February 15, 2026
Senators Urge CFIUS Probe of 0M UAE Stake in Trump-Linked WLFI
Crypto

Senators Urge CFIUS Probe of $500M UAE Stake in Trump-Linked WLFI

February 15, 2026
Next Post
Ledger Confirms Global-e Breach Did Not Affect Wallets

Ledger Confirms Global-e Breach Did Not Affect Wallets

Related News

US Anti-CBDC bill moves a step closer to passing

US Anti-CBDC bill moves a step closer to passing

September 21, 2023
Improving public sector engagement through strategic business development – London Business News | London Wallet

Improving public sector engagement through strategic business development – London Business News | London Wallet

June 4, 2024
FTX seeks to claw back B from Genesis in a battle of the bankrupt

FTX seeks to claw back $4B from Genesis in a battle of the bankrupt

May 4, 2023

Browse by Category

  • Business Finance
  • Crypto
  • Industries
  • Investing
  • jutawantoto
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Real Estate
  • UK

London Wallet

Read latest news about finance, business and investing

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2025 London Wallet - All Rights Reserved!

No Result
View All Result
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Login/Register
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

© 2025 London Wallet - All Rights Reserved!

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?